Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:21-cv-01657

Court:

Connecticut

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Sarala V. Nagala

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. August 04, 2023

    Contractor In Conn. No-Poach Case Files $5.6M Fla. Ch. 11

    Parametric Solutions Inc., one of the Pratt & Whitney contractors accused of engaging in an anti-competitive hiring agreement in Connecticut, has filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the Southern District of Florida, citing $6.1 million in assets and at least $5.6 million in liabilities.

  2. June 05, 2023

    Connecticut Cases To Watch: A Midyear Report

    Courts in Connecticut are working through thorny legal issues involving controversies of national interest and headline-grabbing public figures, and significant decisions in high-dollar civil cases are possible before the end of 2023.

  3. April 06, 2023

    Supplier Admits To No-Poach 'Agreement' In Raytheon Case

    A supplier to Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division has admitted that it "voluntarily participated" in a no-poaching agreement among several aerospace companies, but it denied that it knew the deal was illegal and fought several damages demands in a recent filing.

  4. March 07, 2023

    Raytheon Denies Wrongdoing In Conn. No-Poaching Case

    Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division has denied all wrongdoing in a proposed class action over an alleged no-poaching scheme, saying that any employment actions it undertook were lawful ways to further its "legitimate business interests."

  5. February 14, 2023

    DOJ Asks Judge To Rethink Order In Raytheon Poaching Case

    The U.S. Department of Justice has asked a Connecticut federal judge to reconsider a portion of a ruling in a putative class action accusing Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division of secretly agreeing with other companies not to recruit or hire its talent in the aerospace sector.

  6. January 23, 2023

    Pratt & Whitney, 5 Contractors Lose Bid To Toss Antitrust Suit

    A proposed antitrust class action against Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division and several of its aerospace subcontractors can continue, a Connecticut federal court ruled, rejecting the companies' bid to toss out allegations that they worked together to restrict hiring and suppress salaries.

  7. July 11, 2022

    Raytheon Seeks Escape From Engineers' No-Poaching Suit

    Raytheon Technologies asked a Connecticut federal judge to dismiss a proposed antitrust class action accusing the defense contractor of taking part in an illegal conspiracy to restrict the hiring and recruiting of engineers and skilled laborers working on aerospace projects.

  8. March 15, 2022

    Quinn Emanuel, DiCello Levitt To Lead Raytheon Antitrust Suit

    A Connecticut federal judge has selected law firms DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLC, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, and local Connecticut law firms Hurwitz Sagarin Slossberg & Knuff LLC and Garrison Levin-Epstein Fitzgerald & Pirrotti PC to serve as interim class counsel in an antitrust case workers brought against Raytheon Technologies and other aerospace firms.

  9. December 15, 2021

    Raytheon, Others Hit With Antitrust Suits Amid DOJ Probe

    Workers hit Raytheon Technologies and other aerospace firms with two putative antitrust class actions Tuesday in Connecticut federal court amid the U.S. Department of Justice's ongoing probe, claiming the firms engaged in anti-competitive practices for nearly a decade by agreeing not to poach competitors' workers.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!