Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
United States of America et al v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:24-cv-03973
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Kendall Brill
- Saul Ewing
- Brooks Pierce
- Covington & Burling
- Keker Van
- Arnold & Porter
- Stradling Yocca
- Hogan Lovells
- Katten Muchin
- Willkie Farr
- Goodwin Procter
- Davis Polk
- Foley & Lardner
- Munger Tolles
- Vinson & Elkins
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Paul Weiss
- Bryan Cave
- Nixon Peabody
- Jones Day
- Cravath Swaine
- Seeger Weiss
- White & Case
- Connell Foley
- Baker & Hostetler
- Foster Graham
- Cohen & Gresser
- Axinn Veltrop
- Sidley Austin
- Taft Stettinius
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Quinn Emanuel
- Winston & Strawn
- Foley Hoag
- Montgomery McCracken
- Kopecky Schumacher
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Cozen O'Connor
- Jaeckle Fleischmann
- Kublanovsky Law
- Williams Mullen
- Breazeale Sachse
- Klaris Law
- Alston & Bird
- Akin Gump
- Bass Berry
- Latham & Watkins
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- Vivid Seats Inc.
- Cleveland Cavaliers
- Live Nation Entertainment Inc.
- Indiana Pacers
- Florida Panthers
- Delaware North Cos. Inc.
- Minnesota Wild
- Endeavor Operating Company LLC
- Comcast Spectacor LP
- The Tennessee Titans
- Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
- Viagogo
- Highmark Capital Management Inc.
- The New York Times Co.
- Anschutz Entertainment Group Inc.
- MGM Resorts International
- Feld Entertainment Inc.
- Creative Artists Agency LLC
- 313 Presents
- Brooklyn Nets
- Comcast Corp.
Government Agencies
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Indiana
- State of Nevada
- State of Tennessee
- State of Michigan
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 17, 2026
Sens. Concerned About Live Nation Case After DOJ 'Ousting'
A group of Senate Democrats is raising concerns about potential political influence at the U.S. Department of Justice, following the abrupt departure of the agency's top antitrust enforcer weeks before Live Nation is set to face trial in the government's monopolization case.
-
February 05, 2026
DOJ Urges Court To Reject Live Nation's View Of Meta Ruling
Enforcers told a New York federal court to reject Live Nation's interpretation of a ruling in an antitrust case against Meta Platforms, saying that claims against the live entertainment giant do not have to accuse it of charging different venues different prices.
-
January 30, 2026
Live Nation Plaintiff States Fight Plan To Stay Antitrust Claims
Nearly three dozen states accusing Live Nation of stifling competition in the live entertainment industry urged a New York federal judge not to pause their state-law claims in order to focus on federal law, arguing that handling all claims at once "will be the most efficient approach."
-
January 23, 2026
Live Nation Antitrust Judge Wants To 'Punt' On State Claims
A federal judge in Manhattan asked Friday whether federal and state authorities accusing Live Nation of stifling competition in live entertainment would consent to staying the state law claims and focus on federal claims in an upcoming trial so it won't end up "lasting five years."
-
December 18, 2025
Judge Wants Live Nation Antitrust Trial Limited To 5 Weeks
A New York federal judge nudged the Justice Department and Live Nation during a hearing Thursday to limit next year's antitrust jury trial against the live entertainment giant to no more than five weeks, not the eight the government wants, although he left open the possibility for more time.
-
December 17, 2025
DOJ Says Live Nation Can't Avoid Jury In Antitrust Case
The Justice Department wants a New York federal judge to force Live Nation to face a jury next year on allegations it bought, coerced and leveraged its way to live performance dominance, arguing in a newly unsealed brief that there are too many factual disputes to upstage the lawsuit.
-
November 19, 2025
Live Nation Looks To End DOJ's Antitrust Case
Live Nation told a New York federal court there's no need for a trial in the antitrust case from the U.S. Department of Justice and a contingent of states because enforcers have not shown that it has monopoly power over any live entertainment market or that it hurt competition.
-
May 05, 2025
Officials Seek More Depo Time In Live Nation Antitrust Suit
U.S. officials have asked a Manhattan federal court to extend deposition time in a lawsuit accusing Live Nation of anticompetitive practices in ticket sales to live entertainment events, saying they need more hours to seek testimony from several entities and individuals who were recently disclosed in the case.
-
May 02, 2025
Live Nation Antitrust Fight Won't Have Split Damages Phase
A Manhattan federal judge declined Friday to break out a possible monetary damages phase in a suit by federal and state authorities accusing Live Nation of quashing competition in live entertainment, saying the move would be unlikely to streamline the complex case.
-
April 28, 2025
DOJ Wants Live Nation Case Split Between Liability, Damages
The U.S. Department of Justice asked a New York federal court on Monday to split the case accusing Live Nation of quashing competition in the live entertainment industry by having a jury decide if the company violated antitrust law and the judge decide what remedies to impose.