Clarifying Standing In False Ad Cases At 9th Circ.
By Erik Swanholt and Kendall Waters (June 4, 2018, 1:09 PM EDT) -- Recent decisions by and within the Ninth Circuit elucidate the contours of Article III standing when plaintiffs seek injunctive relief in false advertising cases despite already having awareness of the claimed false advertising of the product. Although these decisions present a threat of coaching plaintiffs to navigate through potential standing pitfalls in federal courts within the Ninth Circuit, they also offer insights for companies defending against false advertisement or labeling class action claims.
Davidson: An Inability to Rely on Product Labeling Prospectively Amounts to Harm Sufficient to Confer Standing
In October 2017, the Ninth Circuit addressed for the first time the issue of...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!