High Court Says It Shouldn't Have Taken Union Neutrality Case

Law360, New York (December 10, 2013, 11:15 AM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that it should not have agreed to hear a union's appeal of an Eleventh Circuit ruling that an employer's agreement to remain neutral on union organizing could violate anti-bribery law, dismissing the case as improvidently granted.

The court's finding that it should not have agreed to consider Unite Here Local 355's appeal of an Eleventh Circuit ruling reviving a lawsuit brought by dog track worker Martin Mulhall leaves in place the appeals court's decision that that organizing assistance offered by an...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.