Law360, New York (November 17, 2016, 8:56 PM EST) -- Nestle Purina PetCare Co. escaped litigation contending that its Beneful dry food killed dogs or made them seriously ill after a California federal judge held Thursday that a proposed class of pet owners didn’t prove that the product was unsafe, explaining that their allegations heavily relied on a veterinarian's inadmissible opinions.
After expressing doubts about the group’s evidence at a late October hearing, U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen granted Purina’s summary judgment bid for just that reason Thursday, holding that the dog owners simply didn’t provide enough proof of Beneful's alleged health risks to support litigation accusing the company of failing...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!