Considering Disclosure Risks In Sensitive Product Recalls

By Syed Ahmad and Geoffrey Fehling (August 21, 2019, 12:45 PM EDT) -- A New York trial judge recently denied a pharmaceutical company's motion to seal status reports between the company and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration concerning recalls of contaminated vitamin products. The New York Supreme Court rejected the company's argument that the status reports contained proprietary business information about customers and the recall that could be used by customers in future litigation.

The decision highlights the balancing act between comprehensive disclosures during recall efforts and the use of those communications in subsequent insurance or personal injury lawsuits arising out of the recall.


In Otsuka America Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!