NYC Hotel's COVID Coverage Suit Can't Avoid Virus Exclusion

By Shawn Rice
Law360 is providing free access to its coronavirus coverage to make sure all members of the legal community have accurate information in this time of uncertainty and change. Use the form below to sign up for any of our weekly newsletters. Signing up for any of our section newsletters will opt you in to the weekly Coronavirus briefing.

Sign up for our Insurance newsletter

You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:

Select more newsletters to receive for free [+] Show less [-]

Thank You!

Law360 (June 9, 2021, 4:54 PM EDT) -- The owner of New York City's Blue Moon Hotel can't tap into coverage with Travelers for losses from the presence of the coronavirus, a federal judge ruled Tuesday, citing the policy's virus exclusion.

U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman also said it was doubtful the presence of the coronavirus at the hotel caused "direct physical loss of or damage to property." While the coronavirus may cause property to be harmful to people, the judge noted most courts have held that the virus doesn't cause physical loss or damage.

"However, the court need not and does not decide that question," Judge Furman said, referencing the physical loss or damage issue, "because the policy contains a virus exclusion clause that independently and unambiguously bars coverage of [100 Orchard Street LLC's] business losses at issue."

The Blue Moon's business was damaged when the coronavirus, which the court documents say was present at the hotel, made the premises unsafe. The Blue Moon's owner alleged the losses were also caused by government restrictions imposed on travel and nonessential business to slow the spread of the virus.

In Tuesday's ruling, Judge Furman tossed the business interruption suit against The Travelers Indemnity Insurance Co. of America, saying the hotel can't escape the policy's virus exclusion.

The owner has acknowledged in its pleadings that COVID-19 is a viral disease, according to the judge, and alleged its losses were due to the pandemic and the resulting presence of the virus at its hotel.

The hotel's owner can't save coverage by blaming the losses in part on the government shutdown orders, Judge Furman ruled, saying the coronavirus was the primary cause of the losses. The spread of the coronavirus set in motion the government restrictions resulting in the losses, the judge said.

The judge also rejected Orchard Street's position that the virus exclusion doesn't address or apply to losses caused by nationwide disasters like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Rather, Judge Furman found persuasive a California federal judge's rejection of the same argument in W. Coast Hotel Mgmt. LLC v. Berkshire Hathaway Guard Ins. Cos. by likening it to an argument that a coverage exclusion for damage caused by a fire doesn't apply to damage "caused by a very large fire."

Representatives for the parties didn't immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday.

The hotel owner is represented by Randolph D. Janis of Douglas & London PC.

Travelers is represented by Gregory P. Varga and Stephen O. Clancy of Robinson & Cole LLP.

The case is 100 Orchard Street LLC v. The Travelers Indemnity Insurance Company of America, case number 1:20-cv-08452, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

--Editing by Haylee Pearl.

For a reprint of this article, please contact

Attached Documents

Useful Tools & Links

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

100 Orchard Street, LLC v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of America

Case Number



New York Southern

Nature of Suit



Jesse M. Furman

Date Filed

October 09, 2020

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!