Squire's Setback In Hartford Case Shows Cumis Counsel Trap

By Jeff Sistrunk (August 10, 2015, 10:42 PM EDT) -- The California Supreme Court's finding Monday that Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. can sue Squire Patton Boggs LLP to try to recover fees the firm charged while serving as Cumis counsel for a policyholder serves as a warning for independent attorneys to avoid court orders that allow insurers to pursue reimbursement of defense costs, experts say.

While the state high court unanimously ruled that Hartford can bring a direct action against Squire Patton for reimbursement of allegedly excessive and unreasonable fees billed by the firm, the court said the case had several unique elements, including that the law firm itself drafted a...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!