We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Analysis

In Qualcomm Dispute, A Broader Row Between FTC, DOJ

Law360 (May 10, 2019, 8:14 PM EDT) -- Tension between the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission over the antitrust implications of industry-essential patents has boiled to the surface in a case involving Qualcomm's licensing practices, stranding the company, patent holders and IP practitioners in waters churned up by the policy fight.

Each agency has fired its own broadside in a federal court case in California where the commission has alleged Qualcomm's licensing practices for its standard-essential patents violate antitrust law. The DOJ fired first on May 2, with what experts say was an unheard-of intrusion in its sister agency's case, that drew a short, sharp...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Anti-Trust

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

January 17, 2017

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics