Redskins Should Have Sued USPTO, Not Indians: Blackhorse

Law360, New York (September 22, 2014, 3:35 PM EDT) -- The group of American Indians who won the ruling earlier this year canceling the Washington Redskins trademark registrations urged a Virginia federal judge Monday to toss the team's appeal of the decision, saying the case was filed against the wrong defendants in the wrong court.

Attorneys for Amanda Blackhorse and her fellow petitioners said the lawsuit against them, which challenges the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's ruling in June that the team's name is disparaging to Native Americans, should have been filed against USPTO, not the petitioners themselves.

Blackhorse and her fellow petitioners aren't “parties in interest” who can be sued over...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!