Fed. Circ. Causes Power Shift In Software Patent Litigation

By Samir Mehta, Stinson Leonard Street LLP (November 23, 2016, 4:53 PM EST) -- On Nov. 21, the Federal Circuit issued a decision that significantly limits the power of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to institute covered business method reviews. Along with other 2016 decisions, this decision further limits the power of defendants to challenge the validity of software patents. Because of the unique role that CBMs have played in helping defendants to challenge the validity of software patents under 35 U.S.C. § 101, the decision is an important one with major consequences for litigation of software patents. Most importantly, the decision will limit the volume of software patent cases that are eligible for CBMs. The case is Unwired Planet LLC v. Google Inc., case number 15-1812 in the Federal Circuit.[1] This article discusses this decision in the context of the ever-changing landscape of software patent litigation....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!