2nd Circ. Opines On Variable Prepaid Forward Contract Gains

By Lawrence Hill and Kevin Platt (December 3, 2018, 12:49 PM EST) -- On Sept. 26, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a decision from the U.S. Tax Court, which decided in 2017 that an extension of two variable prepaid forward contracts, or VPFCs did not result in taxable exchanges under Section 1001 or Section 1259.[1] In Estate of McKelvey v. Commissioner,[2] it was found that the estate of Andrew McKelvey, the founder of Monster.com, potentially owed $41 million in taxes as a result of the extensions. The case was ultimately remanded to determine whether certain gains were short-term and for calculation of certain long-term capital gains....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!