We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Why Bristol-Myers Applies To Absent Class Members: Part 3

Law360 (August 8, 2018, 2:35 PM EDT) -- The split among courts over the application of Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California[1] in class actions is growing. This three-part article examines the reasoning of courts that have declined to apply BMS to absent class members. I conclude that these courts have produced internally contradictory and legally problematic results. 

The first installment of this article reviewed a couple of key principles: first, that specific jurisdiction does not transfer or extend from one plaintiff’s claim to another’s, and second, that absent class members are “parties” for...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.