How Plaintiffs' Forum Shopping Paid Off In Novartis Case

Law360, New York (December 5, 2013, 12:36 PM EST) -- The recent opinion in Rowland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., ___ F. Supp.2d ___, (W.D. Pa. Nov. 22, 2013), has us shaking our heads. That's not so much because of the legal issue being fought over, but rather because of the machinations that led to a most peculiar result.

Basically, forum shopping paid off.

Rowland involved three plaintiffs, Rowland, Machin and Orr, all of whom are (or were) Pennsylvania residents. Rowland, at *1. However, none of them filed suit in Pennsylvania. Rowland and Machin brought suit in D.C., and Orr in New York. Id. at *2.

Rowland is yet another Aredia/Zometa case....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!