Wal-Mart Bribe Investigator's Work Not Privileged, Judge Says

Law360, New York (May 5, 2017, 8:31 PM EDT) -- An Arkansas federal judge ruled Friday that shareholders in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. could conduct a second, more probing deposition of a special investigator who looked into bribery at the retailer's Mexican branch, rejecting the company's assertions of privilege over his findings.

The class of investors, which is led by a retirement fund known as PGERS, seeks damages from Wal-Mart related to a drop in its stock price that followed a 2012 New York Times report that the company had turned a blind eye to large-scale bribery at Wal-Mart de Mexico. The plaintiffs have accused Wal-Mart several times of using sweeping assertions...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!