Justices Eye Scope Of Liability In SEC Copy-Paste Case

By Jon Hill (December 3, 2018, 9:17 PM EST) -- U.S. Supreme Court justices zeroed in on distinctions between conduct and statements during oral arguments Monday in a closely watched appeal that pits an investment banker against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and tests the limits of so-called scheme liability in securities fraud cases.

Francis V. Lorenzo, who headed up the investment banking division at brokerage Charles Vista LLC, has argued that the D.C. Circuit got it wrong in September 2017 when it backed an SEC finding of fraudulent scheme liability on his part for having allegedly sent out to investors two emails copied and pasted from his boss that...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!