Why It's Time To Rethink Illinois Brick

By Samuel Miller (October 5, 2018, 12:25 PM EDT) -- This term, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider whether iPhone owners who purchased apps from the Apple app store can proceed with a federal antitrust claim arguing that Apple has illegally monopolized the market for iPhone apps. The case is Apple Inc. v. Pepper (In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation).[1] The issue is whether iPhone owners who purchase apps from Apple's app store, and who paid Apple for the purchase should be considered "direct purchasers" within the meaning of Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois,[2] which holds that only "direct purchasers" from an antitrust defendant are entitled to sue for treble damages under the federal antitrust laws....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!