Gilstrap's Venue Test: The 4 Factors And What They Mean

By Yar Chaikovsky and Wei Wang (July 12, 2017, 11:47 AM EDT) -- Under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), "[a]ny civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business." On the heels of TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, where the U.S. Supreme Court held that § 1400(b) "is the sole and exclusive provision controlling venue in patent infringement actions,"[1] Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the Eastern District of Texas — in an opinion published on June 29, 2017 — laid out a four-factor test for determining what constitutes "a regular and established place of business."...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!