Revisiting Preclusion Principles In Derivative Actions

By Jonathan Richman (July 28, 2017, 12:46 PM EDT) -- The chancellor of Delaware's Court of Chancery has urged the Delaware Supreme Court to revise Delaware law on preclusion in shareholder derivative actions. The court's July 25, 2017, decision in In re Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Delaware Derivative Litigation recommended that the Supreme Court adopt a rule that a judgment in one derivative action cannot bind the corporation or its stockholders in another derivative action unless either (1) the first action has survived a motion to dismiss because a presuit demand on the corporation's board of directors would have been futile or (2) the board has given the plaintiff authority to proceed on the corporation's behalf by declining to oppose the derivative suit. In other words, preclusion would not apply unless the stockholder in the first case had been empowered by either a court or the board to assert the corporation's claims....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!