High Court's Frog Opinion Reaches Beyond ESA

By Keith Bradley (December 19, 2018, 12:50 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service made headlines because of the sad outcome for the dusky gopher frog, an endangered species for which the FWS had identified critical habitat. The court interpreted the Endangered Species Act to allow critical habitat designations only in areas that the FWS determines are truly habitat for a given species. The ESA is unquestionably a statute with broad scope, and the Weyerhaeuser opinion is important guidance for the FWS' decisions under the statute. However, a second aspect of the opinion will likely have even larger consequences because...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!