Innovator Liability Is The Least Scary Thing About Rafferty

By Terry Henry (April 3, 2018, 2:56 PM EDT) -- Legal newsletters, blogs and client alerts have blown up over Rafferty v. Merck, the recent decision from the Supreme Court of Massachusetts that opens the door to innovator liability claims in that state. Plenty has been written about the court's adoption of innovator liability, but there are other troubling aspects of that opinion; the vagueness of the court's recklessness standard and the absence of the learned intermediary.

The central holding of Rafferty is that a brand drug manufacturer, the company that receives FDA approval to market a drug with a new drug application (NDA), can be liable for harm caused when...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!