Activists Can Make Case For Pipeline Shutoff, Panel Says

Law360 (April 23, 2018, 8:12 PM EDT) -- Four climate change activists charged with tampering with an Enbridge Inc. tar sands pipeline can present evidence at their trial that their actions were necessary to prevent environmental harm caused by fossil fuel use, a Minnesota appeals court said Monday in upholding a lower court ruling.

Local prosecutors had argued that a Clearwater County, Minnesota, judge's ruling that the activists could rely on a necessity defense in their criminal damage and trespass cases will critically hurt the state's ability to successfully prosecute them because it will unnecessarily confuse a jury and conflate the issue of their climate change motivations and the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!