Samsung Can't Force Galaxy S3 Arb With Hidden Agreement

Law360 (May 21, 2018, 7:23 PM EDT) -- A Pennsylvania federal judge said Monday that Samsung can’t dismiss or force into arbitration a proposed class action seeking damages after a consumer's Galaxy S3 phone allegedly overheated and caused a fire, determining that the company had essentially hidden its arbitration agreement in a 64-page informational booklet.

U.S. District Judge Michael A. Ponsor called Samsung Electronics America Inc.'s arguments in support of its dismissal bid “unpersuasive,” and determined that consumers shouldn’t be bound to agreements that they might struggle to find.

“It is one thing to hold consumers to agreements they have not read; it is another to hold them to...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!