A New Approach To Industry Custom Evidence In California

By Alan Lazarus (September 5, 2018, 2:41 PM EDT) -- In Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp.,[1] the California Supreme Court broke with 40-plus years of intermediate court of appeal precedents barring manufacturers from using evidence of their compliance with industry custom and practice to prove their design was not defective. Rather, the court held, such evidence is no longer categorically inadmissible, but neither is it categorically admissible. Admissibility depends on the nature of the evidence and the purpose for which it is offered....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!