The 'Naked Tax' In FTC V. Qualcomm Is Patently Absurd

By David Teece (February 1, 2019, 2:29 PM EST) -- In a San Jose courtroom, during the government shutdown, those that care can be witness to a controversial antitrust case literally brought days before the change in administration that, far from improving competition, threatens to harm American industry and American consumers by crippling the leading innovator in mobile technology, Qualcomm, all in the name of shaving a few dollars off the price of Apple's and other implementers' technology licensing cost. The new incoming acting Federal Trade Commission commissioner at the time wrote a rare and biting dissent arguing that the case has no economic basis; but in the deadlock of 1-1 commissioner vote at the time, the case went forward while the FTC waited to be reconstituted....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!