Oracle's Anti-Arbitration Line Is 'Man Bites Dog,' Judge Says

By Dorothy Atkins (February 15, 2019, 7:18 PM EST) -- A Ninth Circuit panel appeared skeptical Friday of Oracle Inc.'s appeal of a decision to send an ex-worker's putative class action over sales commission pay to arbitration, with one judge calling the company's anti-arbitration stance ironic and a "man bites dog" situation.

During a hearing in San Francisco, U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik, who sat on the three-judge panel by designation, said big companies are typically the ones insisting on arbitration and "making class actions disappear." But in this case, Oracle is fighting the district judge's decision to send plaintiff Marcella Johnson's case to arbitration.

"There's a man bites dog aspect...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms

Companies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!