Walmart Wins At NJ High Court In Fight Over Medical Terms

Law360 (March 4, 2019, 5:18 PM EST) -- Walmart Stores Inc. scored a victory Monday when the New Jersey Supreme Court axed a bright-line rule set by a state appellate panel barring medical experts from using terms like "somatization" and "symptom magnification" at trial to explain inconsistencies between personal injury plaintiffs' claims and medical evidence.

Saying trial courts must determine the admissibility of that testimony on a case-by-case basis, the justices reinstated a jury verdict in the retail giant's favor after concluding that a trial judge properly allowed Walmart experts to use such terms in challenging Alexandra Rodriguez's claims over a 2010 incident in which a clothing display rack...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!