Uber Insurer Needn't Cover Driver's Injury, 10th Circ. Says

By Jeff Sistrunk (August 21, 2019, 5:47 PM EDT) -- An Uber driver can't force the ride hailing company's insurer to cover her medical bills following a 2017 accident, the Tenth Circuit has affirmed, agreeing with an Oklahoma federal judge that coverage is unavailable because the driver was not carrying a passenger when the crash occurred.

In a unanimous opinion, a three-judge panel of the appellate court on Tuesday upheld U.S. District Judge Scott L. Palk's June 2018 order granting summary judgment to Uber Technologies Inc.'s insurer, James River Insurance Co., in its dispute with driver Bonni Genzer.

According to court documents, in April 2017, Genzer had finished driving an Uber...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!