High Court Won't Review $5.2M Judgment Despite Atty DQ

Law360 (January 13, 2020, 3:15 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it will not review a $5.2 million judgment against the owner of a historic Iowa building and other entities that has withstood appeal even though a law firm represented both sides of the financial dispute at different stages of the site's renovation and eventual foreclosure.

The high court did not detail why it opted not to review the lower appellate court's determination that while Winthrop & Weinstine PA should be disqualified from the case, Mako One Corp. and the other entities should still be on the hook for the overdue lease payments and fees...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!