9th Circ. Denials Sustain Consumer Arbitration Hurdles

Law360 (April 27, 2020, 12:15 PM EDT) -- Do you think your company's arbitration agreement is enforceable in California? If you do, think again.

Three years ago, the California Supreme Court dramatically upended the landscape for consumer arbitration agreements. In a controversial opinion that confounded federal district courts, the California Supreme Court in McGill v. Citibank NA,[1] held that arbitration agreements are invalid unless they allow plaintiffs to seek public injunctive relief. Since its issuance in April of 2017, class action plaintiffs have wielded the McGill rule as a powerful weapon for evading consumer arbitration agreements. 

Many, if not most, consumer arbitration agreements in California are broadly drafted to...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!