What Justices' Arbitration Pact Pass Means For Calif. Cos.

By Steven Katz (June 17, 2020, 4:04 PM EDT) -- Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review the California Supreme Court's ruling in OTO LLC v. Kho,[1] California employers are going to need to review their arbitration programs.

In OTO, the California Supreme Court held, in the words of the dissenting justice:

[T]hat an arbitration agreement is substantively unconscionable — and therefore unenforceable — precisely because it prescribes procedures that, according to the majority, have been "carefully crafted to ensure fairness to both sides."[2] OTO breaks new ground in California arbitration law and could be interpreted to call into question the enforceability of many employer arbitration programs in...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!