Ring Can't Force Arbitration In Security Cam False Ad Suit

By Mike Curley (August 7, 2020, 4:05 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge won't let Ring LLC send to arbitration a proposed class action alleging it didn't tell consumers that optional features of its security cameras cost more, saying the buyer didn't agree to the arbitration agreement because he never used the products.

In an order filed Thursday, U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner said the case will stay in court because the label on the box stated that buyers agree to the terms and conditions through "use of the product," but named plaintiff James Andrews never used it.

According to the suit, Andrews bought two home security products made...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!