4 Takeaways From Uber, Lyft's Worker Classification Loss

By Braden Campbell (August 11, 2020, 7:54 PM EDT) -- The San Francisco Superior Court's ruling Monday that Uber and Lyft must treat their drivers as employees under California law represents a seismic shift in a sprawling legal battle over how to classify workers in the gig economy.

Judge Ethan Schulman's order blew a massive hole in the companies' claims that their workers are independent contractors, at least under California's revamped classification test. But a looming campaign to exclude gig economy companies from the state's Assembly Bill 5 and an impending election that could extend California's revamp nationally mean this fight is far from over.

"I think everybody recognizes that this...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!