Nike Needn't Hand Over Pay Analyses In Sex Bias Suit

By Hailey Konnath (October 9, 2020, 11:09 PM EDT) -- An Oregon federal judge on Friday declined to force Nike Inc. to produce analyses comparing how the clothing giant pays and promotes male and female employees at its headquarters in the Beaver State, finding that the documents are shielded by attorney-client privilege.

Current and former Nike employees Kelly Cahill, Sara Johnston, Lindsay Elizabeth and Heather Hender hit Nike with the proposed class action in 2018, claiming Nike violated the Equal Pay Act and Oregon state law by maintaining policies that create and exacerbate gender disparities in pay and promotions at the company's headquarters in Beaverton. They also alleged that women's complaints...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Judge Analytics

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!