Analysis

Mass. Justices' Med Mal Standard Repeal Stuns Plaintiff Attys

Law360 (March 4, 2021, 5:47 PM EST) -- The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court shocked many plaintiffs' attorneys last week when it abolished an "unnecessarily confusing" alternative standard used by juries to determine whether a health care provider caused a patient's injury, with some calling the ruling unnecessary and a sweeping transformation of decades of jurisprudence.

Defense attorneys, however, welcomed the ruling, saying it provides clarity for judges and juries and will give the defense bar confidence that juries will render fair verdicts.

The state high court on Feb. 26 affirmed a defense verdict in a suit accusing nurse practitioner Anna Foster and her supervising physician, Dr. Richard Miller, of causing...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!