Fed. Circ. Raytheon Ruling Shifts Obviousness Analysis

By John Nilsson (June 18, 2021, 1:18 PM EDT) -- In Raytheon Technologies Corp. v. General Electric Co.[1], the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit returned to one of the more interesting issues in patent law jurisprudence — the distinctions between analyzing an anticipatory reference under Title 35 of the U.S. Code, Section 102, and analyzing an obviousness reference (or combination of references) under Section 103....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.

A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!