Pa. Justices Split Over Whether Two Words Warrant Retrial
By Matthew Santoni ( September 21, 2021, 5:26 PM EDT) -- At least two members of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania were divided Tuesday over whether an attorney's implication that a former NFL player "couldn't find" a single expert among thousands who could back up his lawsuit was prejudicial enough to warrant tossing a jury's verdict and granting a new trial in his medical malpractice case....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.