Class Slams Cricket's Bid For Arbitration In False 4G Ad Suit
By Nadia Dreid (September 24, 2021, 6:05 PM EDT) -- Cricket Wireless can't attract customers with promises of contract-free service, then turn around and claim they're contracted to arbitrate their claims when sued by those same customers, a California federal court was told.
Cricket customers who have accused the AT&T-owned mobile company of advertising unlimited 4G/LTE service that it couldn't provide are coming out swinging against attempts to kill their litigation or force their claims into arbitration.
The certified class filed two motions Thursday, one opposing Cricket's motion for summary judgment and another fighting the company's arbitration bid. Both are unfair, the class told U.S. District Judge William Alsup.
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!