NJ Firms At Odds Over Sharing Blame In Malpractice Suit

By Bill Wichert (October 25, 2021, 8:05 PM EDT) -- Two New Jersey firms have offered competing takes on whether a state Supreme Court ruling means they could share the blame in a lawsuit from a former mutual client over a dismissed medical malpractice action.

In separate letters Friday to Superior Court Judge Stephen L. Petrillo, Gill & Chamas LLC and Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP took opposing stances on the applicability of the Supreme Court's opinion last year in Samuel Mejia v. Quest Diagnostics Inc. in connection with Eichen Crutchlow's bid to dismiss a third-party complaint from Gill & Chamas.

The dispute largely centers on whether the firms may be joint tortfeasors,...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!