SDNY Mootness Fee Refusal May Shake Up A Common Tactic

By Joseph Adams (February 24, 2022, 5:49 PM EST) -- A federal court in New York recently dealt a blow to the common litigation practice of plaintiffs counsel requesting a mootness fee when challenging disclosures made by public companies in mergers and other large transactions.

In the Feb. 7 Serion v. Nuance Communications Inc. decision, U.S. District Judge Paul Oetken of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order denying a request by a lawyer representing an investor, Albert Serion, who had challenged the multibillion dollar acquisition of Nuance Communications Inc. by Microsoft Corp.

In that case, the plaintiff had filed a complaint alleging violations...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!