Clarity Required: US V. Banki

Law360, New York (January 9, 2012, 12:32 PM EST) -- On Oct. 24, 2011, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit released an opinion in United States v. Banki, No. 10-3381 (2d Cir. Oct. 24, 2011) that reversed convictions of defendant Mahmoud Reza Banki on charges of conspiring to violate the Iranian Transaction Regulations ("ITR") and aiding and abetting violations of the ITR.[1] In doing so, the court contradicted the position of the U.S. government in a manner that may have important consequences for how the government pursues sanctions enforcement...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.