Law360, New York (July 16, 2012, 1:05 PM EDT) -- Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts found that a relator's complaint was barred by the False Claims Act's first-to-file requirement and dismissed the relator's complaint. United States ex rel. Heineman-Guta v. Guidant Corp., et al. (No. 09-CV-11927-RGS). In holding that a previously filed complaint does not need to satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) in order to bar a later-filed FCA claim, the court intensified a developing divide among courts about the breadth of the FCA's first-to-file rule.
Two Approaches to First-to-File
The FCA's first-to-file requirement — designed to prevent repetitive lawsuits and incentivize relators...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!