Wiretap Act Doesn't Trump State Law, Carrier IQ Judge Says

Law360, New York (July 24, 2012, 8:30 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge on Tuesday remanded to state court one of the dozens of putative class actions accusing Carrier IQ Inc. of secretly collecting smartphone users' data, rejecting the company's argument that the federal Wiretap Act trumps state privacy law.

Seeking to keep the action in the Northern District of California, Carrier IQ contended that Congress had explicitly expressed an intent to preclude state laws — including the California Invasion of Privacy Act, one of the statutes named in the instant action that alleged only...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Shively v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al


Case Number

3:12-cv-00290

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Judge

Edward M. Chen

Date Filed

January 17, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.