Law360, New York (March 5, 2013, 7:55 PM EST) -- The "parol evidence rule" has long been a part of California's and other jurisdictions' laws. It provides that, when parties enter into an integrated written contract intended to be the complete, exclusive and final embodiment of the terms agreed to, outside evidence may not be used to contradict or alter those agreed-to terms.
However, a recent California Supreme Court decision significantly undercuts this rule by expanding parties' ability to use outside evidence to claim that their contracts should be voided because they were induced by fraud.
In California, the parol evidence rule is articulated in two statutes:
1. Code of Civil...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!