Hearst Says Unpaid Interns' Claims Too Varied For Class Cert.

Law360, New York (March 19, 2013, 2:54 PM EDT) -- The Hearst Corp. pushed back Monday in New York against a bid for class certification brought by a group of unpaid interns who allege the magazine publisher violated federal law by using them to fill gaps in its workforce, saying they fail to show an unlawful companywide policy.

Hearst urged the court to deny a class certification motion brought by eight interns who claim the publishers' policies violate Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. Each of the 19 Hearst magazines that offer unpaid...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Wang v. The Hearst Corporation


Case Number

1:12-cv-00793

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Labor: Fair Standards

Judge

J. Paul Oetken

Date Filed

February 1, 2012

Law Firms

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.