Geico Can't Escape Suit Over UIM Coverage Info

Law360, New York (November 8, 2013, 7:47 PM EST) -- A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday refused to dismiss claims in a putative class action against Geico General Insurance Co. that it failed to inform customers of available uninsured or underinsured coverage, saying the allegations precluded immunity under state law.

Shannon Ensey's suit accuses Geico and several of its divisions of violating a New Jersey law that requires an insurer to gain written consent from consumers for all policies that carry uninsured/underinsured coverage limits that are below the policy's bodily injury limits or $250,000, whichever...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

ENSEY v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al


Case Number

1:12-cv-07669

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Judge

Joseph E. Irenas

Date Filed

December 14, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.