Netflix-Walmart Deal Hurt Competition, 9th Circ. Hears

Law360, San Francisco (February 13, 2014, 6:26 PM EST) -- Netflix Inc. subscribers urged the Ninth Circuit on Thursday to revive their antitrust multidistrict litigation accusing Netflix of conspiring with Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to corner the online DVD sales and rental markets, arguing that a lower court ignored evidence they were harmed by the alleged conspiracy.

A California federal judge was wrong to buy Netflix's argument that it didn't view Wal-Mart as a viable competitor and that a 2005 agreement in which Netflix would acquire Wal-Mart's subscriber base didn't constitute an anti-competitive move, plaintiffs attorney Robert Abrams...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Andrea Resnick, et al v. Netflix, Inc., et al


Case Number

11-18034

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 Antitrust

Date Filed

December 21, 2011


Case Title

Theodore H. Frank, et al v. Netflix, Inc., et al


Case Number

12-15705

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3410 Antitrust

Date Filed

March 30, 2012

Law Firms

Companies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.