Lawyers Weigh In On High Court's Halliburton Ruling

Law360, New York (June 23, 2014, 6:12 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court refused on Monday to overturn its Basic v. Levinson decision but ruled that securities defendants may rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance before class certification. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision in Halliburton Co. et al. v. Erica P. John Fund is significant.

George W. Arnett III, McCarter & English LLP

"The ultimate effect of splitting this baby is that securities class action plaintiffs and defendants will both face steep discovery and motion practice costs in cases where, had the court ruled otherwise, we would have seen earlier resolution. The decision allows a defendant corporation to...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!