High Court Ruling Leaves Confusion Over 401(k) Monitoring

By Aaron Vehling (May 18, 2015, 9:07 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in a case accusing Edison International of imprudently investing its workers' 401(k) funds has made clear that plan fiduciaries have to monitor plans continuously, but attorneys say the court wasn't specific enough about what that obligation actually entails.

The high court's eight-page decision Monday unanimously vacated a Ninth Circuit ruling that Edison workers' $373 million Employee Retirement Income Security Act claims were time barred. The justices said the appeals court incorrectly applied the statutory bar based solely on the initial selection of the mutual funds at issue without considering the specifics of the alleged breach of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!