Uber Background Check Suit Paused For Arbitration Appeal

Law360, New York (July 22, 2015, 7:00 PM EDT) -- A California federal judge on Wednesday agreed to pause all but "reasonable discovery" in a proposed class action over Uber Technologies Inc.'s background checks of drivers, ruling that allowing non-discovery motions to proceed would harm Uber as it appeals his rejection of mandatory arbitration.

U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen ruled in a suit alleging Uber violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by running background checks without authorization that motions on the merits should be paused pending Uber's appeal of its motion to compel arbitration for both the instant suit and a sister suit.

If the case were allowed to proceed...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!